The victim's mother found Yvonne's body when she came to her house to pick up her son for school. When she didn't get an answer to her knock she entered the unlocked front door. Two of the victim's children were locked in a 2nd floor bedroom one was found wandering around the house. None of the children were harmed.
No. There were no broken doors, windows or locks. The lock on the sliding glass door on the front of the 2nd floor was broken. The victim reportedly did not usually lock her 1st floor front door.
No. When the cause of death is murder, the focus should be on finding the person who committed the crime. The body IS the evidence. This victim’s hands and bare feet were not bagged to preserve defensive wounds and evidence, and her body was moved around without guarding against contamination.
No. Although David’s grandfather’s family attorney advised the police not to talk to David until he could be present, detectives pushed him into a room and interrogated him anyway. They phoned his attorney for permission to take photos of his body, fingerprinted him and confiscated his vehicle. They referred to him as a “spoiled brat rich kid”. Later they would say it aroused their suspicions of him as a suspect when he “lawyered up”.
Only because he had a child with the victim. Husbands, boyfriends and close family members are generally considered the first suspects. The victim’s parents both told the police that David and Yvonne had a good relationship and that they didn’t think David would hurt her. Additionally, he had an alibi the night of the murder, as he was at a shoot-fighting class over an hour away from town.
The victim had five children by (reportedly) five men. The only other father contacted was the father of her third son, who was incarcerated at the time of the murder, so he was not interrogated as much as interviewed
No. An APB was put out on one man, but was never followed up on. Another man was asked to be interviewed, but refused to waive his right to counsel. He was released and never interviewed. A close family friend was interviewed at length, but released without further interaction.
The decedent was a victim of murder from an incised wound to her neck. Other injuries suffered at or around the time of death were a bruise to her right upper thigh and a bump on the top left side of her head.
Yes. Two reports were given to detectives on the day the body was discovered. One neighbor saw a man entering the house the evening the victim was murdered and one neighbor saw a man exiting the house the morning the body was discovered. Neither matched the description of David Thorne or Joseph Wilkes.
A photo line-up was shown to only one of the witnesses. He was shown a six man photo line-up, from which he picked a suspect. He was told he was mistaken, that the man he chose was an Alliance police officer. He was shown another photo line-up the following day with the police officer’s photo removed and David Thorne’s photo in its place. He did not pick a suspect from this line-up.
Other than the two fingerprints belonging to the victim, the only other fingerprint was a remarkably clear print on the hilt of the butcher knife found in the roadway. When asked if this was run through CODIS, the reply given was “Yes”. Then they qualified their answer with information that they had checked it through the Alliance, Canton and Massillon CODIS, and only checked offenders 55 years of age or younger. To date, the print has not been identified.
No. The only outside “expert” consulted was a psychic. Detectives Sampson and Mucklo drove to Cleveland and met with a psychic. They had run out of ideas and thought she could provide some insight.
David had a good relationship with the victim and a solid alibi for the time of the murder. In order to tie David to the crime, he needed an accomplice. Joe Wilkes had met the victim through David. According to Joe, he had been to the victim’s house the last night of her life to invite her to a party. She told him she was expecting company and to come back in an hour. When he arrived back, she was dead. To tie David to the crime, the police coerced Joe into confessing and implicating David. They did this by saying that David was in the next room implicating Joe. Although this was absolutely not true, Joe decided that if David was implicating him for something he didn’t do, he’d do the same to David.
Joe saw a guy he knew from high school on the way to the victim’s house and they spoke briefly. Three months later the man’s girlfriend called police to say that Joe told them he was in town to kill someone and that he had written his name and pager number on a business card and gave it to them. The pair had differing stories of the conversation and even of what Joe was wearing. The girl turned the business card over to police and gave a statement concerning how she came to have it. She testified at trial to the same. Since the trial, a CIA trained handwriting expert conclusively ruled Joe out as the writer of the card. He could not rule out the girl who called the police and gave them the card as the writer. She later admitted she had written the information herself.
Once Joe was offered a deal to implicate David, he was willing to lie to enhance his story. He made a deal with police and the prosecutor for a better sentence. Joe said David picked him up and that they planned the murder. When it was proven that David and Joe had not spent time together, Joe changed his story and said they planned the murder during phone conversations. Joe had recently been thrown out of his girlfriend’s house, and had called David over a dozen times on one morning a week before the murder in the early morning hours. David unplugged his phone after the first call without answering it. An Ameritech employee testified that in his opinion all of the calls were answered by an answering machine.
Detectives told Joe they would blame him for the crime whether he cooperated or not, and they would be believed over him. Feeling he had no choice and believing the detectives when they told him David was implicating him, Joe took a deal of 30 years, with a promise that he’d serve 7. Thinking that was better than being “lit up like the 4th of July in Ohio’s electric chair”, which they also offered him, Joe agreed and implicated David in a crime that neither of them committed. For his efforts Joe was given 30 years to life. No mention was ever made again of the 7 years.
David was arrested on July 14, 1999. After Joe’s confession and implication, detectives and officers from three counties went looking for David Thorne. When they found he was not at home, they went to his girlfriend’s house to arrest him. David’s grandfather called ahead and warned David that they were coming, asking him to remove the garage door opener and ignition keys from his vehicle. David did as he was asked, and left them and his personal effects with his girlfriend for safe keeping. He then stood against the vehicle and waited for the police to arrive to arrest him. David Thorne was taken to the Stark County jail and held on $1,000,000 bond pending trial.
No. David’s grandfather called their family attorney and asked him to take David’s case. He wasn’t death penalty certified, which in a murder case would be required. He recommended George Keith, who said he’d do it if they’d hire Jeffrey Haupt as co-counsel. The pair charged David’s family $100,000.00 to represent David.
No. During the trial, David smelled alcohol on his attorney every day. Once he came to court in the same clothes he’d had on the day before, looking as if he’d slept in them. He called one witness and re-called two prosecution witnesses. He was chastised by the presiding judge multiple times throughout the trial for talking to himself, mumbling and not making sense.
After 3 hours of deliberating, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. During the sentencing phase, there was a hung jury, as they could not agree on a sentence. The judge declared a hung jury and sentenced David to life without parole.
Yes. He was brought before the Bar Association, who refused to reprimand him. At David’s Post-Conviction hearing in 2003, Jeffrey Haupt testified against David. Jeffrey Haupt was found years later dead in his back yard, where he’d stumbled home drunk and died.
Yes. David has appealed his conviction and filed for post-conviction relief after new evidence was uncovered supporting his claim of innocence.